This past month, as I’ve embarked on my sabbatical project, this advice has come to mind several times. Like many of you, I often bookmark, save, and file new research about how our youngest students learn to read and write. Maybe it’s the headline that grabs my eye. Or maybe it’s the names involved in a research study that pique my interest. But in the busy day to day life of an educator, there’s usually little time to read all of this information and so it starts to simply pile up on a wish list of professional development. One of the great gifts of a sabbatical is the opportunity to go through all of these saved resources, which is exactly what I’ve been doing this month.
As I slowly made my way through the research studies, literacy symposiums, blogs, and articles I asked myself questions. First, I thought about how relevant and reliable the information provided would be to educators on the front lines. It was important to me to make information that’s relevant to everyday teaching available to teachers in an easily accessible way. Second, I considered the sources. Many programs, companies, and websites have jumped on the bandwagon and stamped “research based” or “evidence based” on their literacy curricula, but it’s important to carefully evaluate such claims. Episode 125 of the podcast Melissa & Lori Love Literacy helped me with this process as they interviewed Andrew Watson, an educator and author, who spoke about how to best discern and distill this information. He suggested using these three questions to help unpack the legitimacy of research and information:
Determine if you trust the speaker or person presenting the information. Ask yourself what is the best research you know of that supports that idea?
Review the study or material. Ask yourself if it is a good proxy for your students or scenario?
Look for more research and consider which way does most of the research point you in?
And finally, I feel that it’s very important for information to be provided in a helpful and nonjudgmental way. Reigniting the Reading Wars will not help teachers or students. I look at this work for both myself and other educators as a collaborative process where we should be supporting and challenging each other, not vilifying each other. Often the first way to achieve that is to provide the “why”, the research behind why we need to make instructional changes, to move forward together. This is why I consistently ground my own work in the quote “when you know better, you do better.”